<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Processing diagrams</title>
		<description>Discuss Processing diagrams</description>
		<link>http://www.togaf-modeling.org/models/technology-architecture-menu/processing-diagrams-menu.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:03:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.togaf-modeling.org/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/27/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>phil says:</title>
			<link>http://www.togaf-modeling.org/models/technology-architecture-menu/processing-diagrams-menu.html#comment-11</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nicolas, I agree that colour shall not be the only marker (black & white is still massively used) You will see a more complete definition of used symbols in the communication diagrams. I disagree on your comment about containment : this is the UML internal structure/parts semantics, very well defined by the UML standard. It expresses that the application component is deployed withing the container device, or the container technological component (application server for example). It is a much clearer and precise semantics that some link. Composition has a uge number of semantic variations.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.togaf-modeling.org/models/technology-architecture-menu/processing-diagrams-menu.html#comment-11</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nicolas Figay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.togaf-modeling.org/models/technology-architecture-menu/processing-diagrams-menu.html#comment-10</link>
			<description><![CDATA[On this page, the difference of color between Entity Application Component and Utily component makes it not so obvious to distinguish. In addition, some components have colors which are not explicitly defined in explanation of used symbol. Finally, the usage of containment in order to represent the composition/decomposition makes it not so explicit (compared to relations) what is exactly the kind of composition relation. So it should be somewhere stated which kind of composition are allowed and what is the associated semantic.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Figay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.togaf-modeling.org/models/technology-architecture-menu/processing-diagrams-menu.html#comment-10</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
